Question by : You know what sickens me about the West’s attitude to Kim Jong-il’s death?
I’m sure by now you’re all aware of Kim Jong-il’s death. He was one of the remaining enemies to capitalism we have left, and while not a communist per-se, his flavour of Confucian quasi-nationalism had undeniably socialist flavors to its ideological thinking. Thus, it is a more reasoned form of socialism than the Rev(isionist)Leftites subscribe to, and as well, a more rational and relatable at any rate than nationalism proper.
It is foolish to applaud Kim Jong-il’s death whether like or hate, whether this was to your whim or woe. He was amongst the sole opponents remaining in a stance resolutely against the American regime. Then there’s all this ‘socialism for babies’ neo-liberalist agenda figuratively pissing a mess over the entire Jucheist movement for the benefit of their own distancing. At sovietempire.com they are celebrating his death. At revleft.org they are celebrating his death. I’m more than certain.
But here is the sad truth to so turn the other edge of the sword revealing a so brutal truth of the reality of RevLeft and SovEmp’s allegiances: they only care for the gays, they only care for women, they only care for those who believe they’re women when they’re blatantly not, and so on. The poor is an organ and masses they so in their bourgeois pseudo-worker contempt piss on with delight. The morality and ideals of communism are ones that have long eluded their collective, 4chan-esque, anonymous troll hivemind. Socialism and principles are not hand in hand for them; it is their divorce on the pretext of their little pent, personal, insecurity-entwined issues that, in their collective groups, help enforce a continual cycle of exhaltion thereby; for each daddy-complex or gender crisis they come together to create a banding together and mislabel it ‘socialist revolution.’
They are part of the problem.
They are the bourgeoisie.
One’s intellectual fortitude must be comprised of absolute moronic stupdity to celebrate the death of this man. Let’s present it this way; what do we have left? If I went there tommorow, and I’ve the Korean language skills to direct a documentary on the country, there would be no censorship from the DPRK state media or other tourist and guidance organs, rather, the Western autists and their banking and media cartel elite — probably half-comprised of RevLeft traitors — would be stifling the word’s course outward in proverbial chastity of its release. Under the context that it was ‘non-political correct’ rhetoric or other pseudo-leftists devices and figures of fascist ideation implantation into the unquestioning media-consumer masses of the Americas and Europe, or they would simply grab it from the post-production process and burn the entire thing thus ensuring its non-broadcast’s immortality, keeping me silenced out of fear of losing my livelihood while stamping copyright protection in favour of their profiteering all through out, using their media propaganda centers to ultimately distort the original image of my message anyway.
It’s censorship like this that not only is ubiquitous to the west but also exclusive and unique to the west. Virtually unseen in other cultures, it is a specifically western phenomenon. Other country’s moderation teams rarely ever ban people but on rare exception of severe and grave rule infraction, genuine cases which aren’t simply a treading on the sensibilities of others. It could conceivably happen but it does not. I’ve been on Russian forums, Iranian forums, pro-DPRK forums which are ultimately run by foreigners, some of which are native to Korea; it is a foreign concept for them to simply ban for banning’s sake, whereas in the West it is what moderators pride themselves on. This shows the incorrectness of Western culture and placing it into light the dispicableness, evilness and sinfulness of their values. It is in power they relish, and its excersize over the people that power in which they relish. Even when the opportunity is to avail it would seem that the Western moderator is more likely to wield it for its own sake than almost any other cultural group’s moderation on the planet. When they don’t have those opportunities, they scurry and scrounge trying to find or, if to no avail, make those opportunities, bending rules and distorting maxim to construct a makeshift banner under which to impose fascism.
The internet was invented to communicate and relate ideas, not to survail, track, and suppress people. A fortess of solitude seems to be more in the interests of Western internet administrators, than facilitating an environment of free exchange, only to get worse.
DPRK and its allies, even after Kim Jong-eun’s successorship, will continue priding itself and bastioning the championship league of moral superiority eschewing the blatant infringement of the rights and freedoms of peoples the US so prophesize in their
“Where did you cut and paste this from?”
Regrettably, I wrote all those myself, a waste of my talent, if I don’t say so myself.
Best answer – Voted by RoseNite.com:
Answer by Max Hoopla
Have a nice day.
Want to know more about adult sex toys? Please Visit RoseNite.com!
